Defendant bribed doctors and pharmacists to unnecessarily
prescribe fentanyl spray intended for breakthrough cancer pain
BOSTON – The former Vice President of Sales of Insys
Therapeutics pleaded guilty today in federal court in Boston to his role in a
nationwide conspiracy to bribe medical practitioners to unnecessarily prescribe
a fentanyl-based pain medication and defraud healthcare insurers.
Alec Burlakoff, 44, of West Palm Beach, Fla., pleaded guilty
before U.S. District Court Judge Allison D. Burroughs to one count of
racketeering conspiracy. Burlakoff and his co-conspirators – all former
managers and executives at Insys – were initially indicted in December 2016; an
October 2017, superseding indictment also charged John Kapoor, the founder and
former executive chairman of Insys. Today, Burlakoff pleaded guilty to the
second superseding indictment.
Burlakoff, and, allegedly, other Insys employees, used
various methods to bribe medical practitioners in various states, many of whom
operated pain clinics, to induce them to prescribe Subsys. Subsys is a
powerful, fentanyl-based pain medication intended to treat cancer patients
suffering intense breakthrough pain.
One method employed by Burlakoff and his alleged
co-conspirators was the Insys Speaker Program (ISP), which was used as a
vehicle to bribe doctors and other clinicians to prescribe Subsys to their
patients. Insys sales representatives targeted and promised medical
professionals the opportunity to be paid Insys speakers if they wrote
prescriptions for Subsys. The more prescriptions written for Subsys – and the
higher the dose – the more speaking opportunities were awarded and more fee
paid to the clinicians. However, the speaking opportunities were merely an
excuse for the clinician and friends to have a meal and drinks paid for by
Insys, and for the speaker to be paid. As a result, insurers were defrauded by
paying reimbursements for Subsys, a more expensive drug than its nearest
competitor, and often prescribed when medically unnecessary and inappropriate.
Other methods were also used to bribe and induce medical
professionals to prescribe Subsys. For example, employees of the practitioner’s
office were moved onto the Insys payroll. Additionally, relatives and
girlfriends of the medical professionals who were high volume writers were also
hired.
As a result of the conspiracy, many patients were inappropriately
prescribed and overprescribed Subsys, which is highly addictive and
dangerous.
The charge of RICO conspiracy provides for a sentence of no
greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine
of $250,000, or twice the amount of pecuniary gain or loss. Sentences are
imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines and other statutory factors.
United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Harold H. Shaw,
Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field
Division; Phillip Coyne, Special Agent in Charge for the Office of Inspector
General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Mark A. McCormack,
Special Agent in Charge of the FDA Office of Criminal Investigations’ Metro
Washington Field Office; Carol S. Hamilton, Acting Regional Director of the
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Boston
Regional Office; Brian D. Boyle, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug
Enforcement Administration, New England Field Division; Leigh-Alistair Barzey,
Special Agent in Charge of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS),
Northeast Field Office; Joseph W. Cronin, Inspector in Charge of the U.S.
Postal Inspection Service; Matthew Modafferi, Special Agent in Charge of the
U.S. Postal Service, Office of Inspector General, Northeast Area Field Office;
and Sean Smith, Special Agent in Charge of the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Inspector General, Northeast Field Office made the announcement
today. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Nathaniel K. Yeager, Fred M. Wyshak, Jr., and
David G. Lazarus, of Lelling’s Office, are prosecuting the case.
The details contained in the charging documents are
allegations. The remaining defendants are presumed innocent unless and until
proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
No comments:
Post a Comment