BUFFALO—U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul,
Jr. announced today that Patrick S. O’Mara, 50, of Buffalo, New York, was
arrested and charged by criminal complaint with mail fraud and health care
fraud. The charges carry a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, a $250,000
fine or both.
Assistant U.S. Attorney John E.
Rogowski, who is handling the case, stated that on February 16, 2004, the
defendant, a Buffalo Police officer, was placed on injured on duty status (IOD)
by the city of Buffalo. According to the complaint, O’Mara was placed on IOD
status for exacerbation of cervical and lumbar strains previously suffered
while on duty. The defendant remained on IOD status until October 18, 2004 when
he was ordered to return to light duty. O’Mara again claimed to have injured
his right arm on March 21, 2005 while lifting two reams of copy paper. While
the defendant did not report the injury to his superiors until 23 days later,
the defendant was placed on IOD status once again on September 6, 2005, where
he remained until he retired on March 31, 2012.
The complaint states that while the
defendant’s primary care physician did not recommend that O’Mara return to
work, several independent medical exams concluded that the defendant was not
permanently disabled. One doctor noted that the defendant walked into his
office using a cane but later witnessed O’Mara walking in the parking lot
without any limp. In addition, the investigation determined that the defendant
worked as a paid musical director and church organist during most, if not all,
of the time that he has been on IOD status. Such work would have involved the
use of his right arm.
The defendant retired from the Buffalo
Police Department effective March 31, 2012, following an independent medical
exam and administrative hearing. The complaint alleges that during an interview
with special agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation on May 9, 2012,
the defendant stated (among other things) that he was capable of performing
light duty and had been playing the organ for a church. Nevertheless, the
defendant stated there was no incentive to return to work on light duty status,
saying, “It is demeaning to sit at a desk and answer phones, and I consider it to
be punishment,” and “The pay on IOD status, which is without taxes, is actually
an incentive to stay off duty in IOD status.”
“By prosecuting those who defraud the
Injured on Duty System, we protect and support the hard working police officers
who may someday need this program for bona fide injuries suffered in the line
of fire,” said U.S. Attorney Hochul. “Abuse of the program not only compromises
the integrity of the entire system, it also deprives city residents of one
additional police officer who would otherwise be available for patrol and
safety. This arrest, the second involving a Buffalo Police officer in a week,
sends a strong and clear message that this type of fraudulent behavior will not
be tolerated.”
“As we stated after last week’s arrest of
Buffalo Police Officer Robert Quintana, the charging of retired Police Officer
Patrick O’Mara today reinforces the FBI and Buffalo Police Department’s
commitment to remove abusers of the Injured on Duty Program from the ranks of
the police department,” said Christopher M. Piehota, FBI Special Agent in
Charge. “Members of law enforcement must discharge their duties with the utmost
respect for ethics and the law. Continued abuse of this worthwhile program
drains city resources and undermines the public’s trust and confidence in its
public servants.”
O’Mara’s arrest is the second in a week
involving a Buffalo Police officer. On May 9, 2012, Robert Quintana, who has
been on IOD status since March of 2005, was arrested and also charged with mail
and health care fraud.
The criminal complaint is the culmination
of an investigation by special agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Christopher M. Piehota, and the
Buffalo Police Department, under the direction of Commissioner Daniel Derenda.
The fact that a defendant has been
charged with a crime is merely an accusation, and the defendant is presumed
innocent until and unless proven guilty.
No comments:
Post a Comment