WILLIAMSPORT - The
United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
announced that Rashaun Flemming, age 31, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was
indicted on February 27, 2020, by a federal grand jury on drug trafficking
charges.
According to United States Attorney David J. Freed, the
indictment charges Flemming with four counts of possession with intent to
distribute cocaine base between October 7, 2019 and November 21, 2019, in
Lycoming County.
This case was investigated by the Lycoming County Narcotics
Enforcement Unit and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alisan V. Martin is
prosecuting the case.
This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a
program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities
they serve to reduce violent crime and make our neighborhoods safer for
everyone. The Department of Justice reinvigorated PSN in 2017 as part of the
Department’s renewed focus on targeting violent criminals, directing all U.S.
Attorney’s Offices to work in partnership with federal, state, local, and
tribal law enforcement and the local community to develop effective,
locally-based strategies to reduce violent crime.
Indictments are only allegations. All persons charged by
indictment are presumed to be innocent unless and until found guilty in court.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the
Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the
Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law for possession with
the intent to distribute cocaine base is 30 years’ imprisonment and a
fine. A sentence for each of these
offenses also includes a period of supervised release following
imprisonment. Under the Federal
Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a
number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the
offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to
punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's
educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory
maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence
for a specific defendant
No comments:
Post a Comment