OKLAHOMA CITY – TREVO, LLC, and it principals, MARK STEVENS
and HOLLI STEVENS, have agreed not to contest the distribution of $610,800 to
victims of an alleged email fraud scheme.
In a civil forfeiture complaint filed in July 2016, the
United States alleged that $610,800 in a bank account at Wells Fargo Bank in
Trevo’s name were the proceeds of wire fraud.
Trevo is a multi-level marketing company based in Oklahoma City, with
its primary international office in Nigeria.
Founded by Mark and Holli Stevens in 2009, its main product is nutritional
supplement juice.
According to an affidavit incorporated into the government’s
forfeiture complaint, perpetrators of a number of email fraud schemes
instructed multiple victims to send money to various bank accounts under
Trevo’s control at Wells Fargo Bank and BancFirst. In some instances, perpetrators pretended to
strike up romantic relationships with victims.
In others, they offered fictitious economic opportunities. In both cases, victims agreed to send money
to bank accounts as instructed. In 2014,
Trevo closed its BancFirst accounts and transferred its assets to Wells Fargo
Bank.
After the United States filed its complaint and froze
certain Trevo funds at Wells Fargo Bank, five individuals and one corporation
notified the government they were victims of the alleged frauds and entitled to
a portion of the seized funds. Trevo
also filed a claim to the seized funds.
On August 14, 2018, the United States, Trevo, and Trevo’s
principals agreed the seized funds will be distributed to the six victims and
that Trevo’s claim should be dismissed.
In reaching this settlement, Trevo and its principals did not admit any
involvement in wire fraud and the United States did not concede its allegations
lack merit. The agreement allows the
parties to avoid the delay, expense, inconvenience, and uncertainty of
litigating the proper distribution of the seized funds.
This case was investigated by the FBI. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Wilson D. McGarry,
Don Evans, and Brandon Hale worked on the case in the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment