Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York, announced today the arrest of EDWARD SHIN, the
CEO of a Pennsylvania-based bank (the “Bank”), for taking bribes in connection
with the Bank’s issuance of loans that were guaranteed by the United States
Small Business Administration (“SBA”).
SHIN was arrested pursuant to a criminal complaint charging him with
taking bribes by siphoning off a portion of commissions on SBA-guaranteed loans
and causing the Bank to issue SBA-guaranteed loans to companies in which SHIN
had a secret interest. The charges are
the culmination of a joint investigation by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation – Office of Inspector General (“FDIC-OIG”), Homeland Security
Investigations (“HSI”), the SBA Office of the Inspector General (“SBA-OIG”),
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and the Office of the Special
Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“SIGTARP”). SHIN is expected for presentment this
afternoon in Manhattan federal court before U.S. Magistrate Judge James L.
Cott.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said: “Edward Shin, the CEO of a Pennsylvania bank,
allegedly exploited his position as a bank officer to illegally issue Small
Business Administration loans to entities in which he had a financial
interest. Furthermore, Shin allegedly
took kickbacks on commissions for those loans from a third party who did no
legitimate work in the loan process. The
Small Business Administration exists to provide funding to those pursuing the
American dream through owning their own businesses. Edward Shin is now charged with attempting to
corrupt that process for his own personal gain.”
According to the allegations in the Criminal Complaint filed
in Manhattan federal court today[1]:
The SBA helps Americans start, build, and grow businesses by
guaranteeing certain loans made by banks to help those businesses succeed. Between 2009 and 2012, EDWARD SHIN was the
CEO of the Bank. During that period, the
Bank offered a range of financial products, including SBA-guaranteed loans to
small businesses in the New York-New Jersey area, which the Bank could extend
only on the condition that all aspects of those loans complied with SBA
regulations and SBA’s standard operating procedures. In particular, SBA regulations and procedures
prohibited bank officers, including SHIN, from receiving any payments in
connection with SBA-backed loans and prohibited banks from extending such loans
to any institution in which a bank officer held an interest.
Notwithstanding these regulations, SHIN secretly solicited
and received bribe payments in connection with SBA-guaranteed loans issued by
the Bank and caused the Bank to extend SBA-guaranteed loans to companies in
which SHIN had secret ownership interests.
Specifically, when the Bank issued a business loan involving a certain
broker (the “Broker”), SHIN secretly arranged to receive a portion of the
Broker’s fee. On other occasions, when
the Bank issued a business loan that did not involve the use of an actual
broker, SHIN arranged to have the Broker inserted unnecessarily into the
transaction solely to generate a broker fee that could be shared with SHIN; in
fact, the Broker did no actual work to earn a commission on those transactions,
but split the “broker’s fee” with SHIN as an illegal kickback.
SHIN also arranged for the Bank to issue SBA-guaranteed
loans to businesses in which he secretly retained an ownership interest, in
violation of SBA regulations and procedures.
For example, in or about December 2010, the Bank issued an
SBA-guaranteed loan for approximately $950,000 to a business in New York, New
York. Although documents submitted to
the Bank for purposes of securing the loan did not mention SHIN’s ownership
interest, the business was secretly operated as a 50-50 partnership between
SHIN and the Broker. After the loan was
issued in or about October 2014, this loan went into default status, ultimately
resulting in a loss to the SBA of approximately $611,491.
*
* *
SHIN, 56, of Ambler, Pennsylvania, is charged with one count
of conspiracy to commit bank bribery, which carries a maximum potential
sentence of five years in prison, and one count each of bank bribery, theft of
funds by a bank officer, and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, each of which
carries a maximum potential sentence of 30 years in prison. The maximum potential sentences in this case
are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes
only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.
Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of the
FDIC-OIG, HSI, FBI, SBA-OIG, and SIGTARP.
This case is being handled by the Office’s Money Laundering
and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Daniel M. Tracer and Tara M. La Morte are in
charge of the prosecution.
[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of
the text of the Complaint and the description of the Complaint set forth below
constitute only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an
allegation.
No comments:
Post a Comment