Five U.S. individuals were charged today and yesterday for
their roles in three separate elder fraud schemes. The schemes collectively defrauded tens of
thousands of Americans, many of whom were elderly, out at least a hundred
million dollars. Four defendants were
charged in the Eastern District of New York, the other was charged in Southern
District of Florida.
“Earlier this year, when we announced the largest elder
fraud sweep in history, we sent a clear message: we will hold perpetrators of elder fraud
schemes accountable wherever they are,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “When criminals steal the hard-earned life
savings of older Americans, we will respond with all the tools at the
Department’s disposal – criminal prosecutions to punish offenders, civil
injunctions to shut the schemes down, and asset forfeiture to take back
ill-gotten gains. Today’s indictment
shows we are following through on this promise, and fraudsters everywhere
should take note of it.”
Three Long Island Residents Indicted for Multi-Million
Dollar Fraud Scheme
Three Long Island residents were charged with running a
fraudulent mass-mailing scheme that tricked thousands of consumers into paying
at least $30 million in fees for falsely promised prizes.
An indictment unsealed Wednesday charges Tully Lovisa, 55,
of Huntington Station, New York; Shaun Sullivan, 37, of Merrick, New York; and
Lorraine Chalavoutis, 61, of Greenlawn, New York, with mail fraud, money
laundering, and conspiring to commit those offenses. The indictment also charges Lovisa with
perjury and additional wire fraud and money laundering offenses. U.S. Postal Inspectors arrested all three
defendants this morning.
“As alleged in the indictment, the defendants perpetrated a
cruel hoax on their victims, many of them elderly and vulnerable, by sending
promotional mailings that falsely claimed they would receive tens of thousands
of dollars in prize money if they paid a fee,” said U.S. Attorney for the
Eastern District of New York Richard P. Donoghue. “In so doing, Lovisa violated prior court
orders directing him to stop engaging in mass mailing operations and his
co-conspirators were well aware of prior enforcement action to stop this
conduct. Protecting the elderly from
brazen predators like the defendants is a priority of this Office and the Department
of Justice.”
The defendants’ prize-promotion mailings led recipients,
many of whom were elderly and vulnerable, to believe that they could claim a
large cash prize in exchange for a modest fee, according to the
indictment. This was false; victims who
submitted fees did not receive large sums of money, the indictment
alleges.
The scheme alleged in the indictment began after the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) sued Lovisa in 2010 for sending deceptive
prize-promotion mailings. In response to
that suit, a court enjoined Lovisa from any involvement with prize-promotion
mailings. But, as alleged in the
indictment, Lovisa did not stop. Rather,
the indictment alleges that he worked with Sullivan and Chalavoutis to set up
numerous prize-promotion companies using straw owners and aliases to continue
defrauding hundreds of thousands of consumers.
Chalavoutis, who provided various important operational services,
allegedly helped conceal Lovisa’s and Sullivan’s control of the operation and
misled others about the nature of the business.
The perjury charge against Lovisa relatedly stems from his
submission to the FTC of a false compliance report, in which he claimed only to
own a construction company and not be involved in prize-promotion
mailings. The additional wire fraud and
money laundering charges relate to Lovisa’s alleged further deception of the
FTC related to the court-ordered sale of a home he owned in Las Vegas. According to the indictment, Lovisa arranged
a sham sale of the house in September 2012 that allowed him to maintain control
of the home and only disgorge $155,500 to the FTC. Lovisa then allegedly sold the house in April
2015 for $540,000.
“For far too long, fraudulent solicitations such as these
have flooded seniors’ mailboxes. This
indictment demonstrates a strong desire to end this conduct when administrative
or civil remedies have been circumvented by these individuals at every
opportunity,” said Chief Postal Inspector Guy Cottrell. “Today’s criminal
charges show the continuing commitment by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service to
rid the mail system of these pernicious threats to the livelihoods of the most
vulnerable Americans.”
The mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy charges each
carry a statutory maximum sentence of twenty years in prison. The money laundering charges each carry a
statutory maximum punishment of ten years in prison. The perjury charge carries a statutory maximum
punishment of five years in prison. Each
charge also carries a statutory maximum fine of $250,000 or twice the gross
gain or gross loss from the offense.
An indictment is an accusation by a federal grand jury and
is not evidence of guilt. The defendants
should be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
The United States Postal Inspection Service investigated the
case. The case is being prosecuted by
Trial Attorneys Daniel Zytnick and Timothy Finley of the Department of
Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles P.
Kelly of the Eastern District of New York.
List Broker Pleads Guilty to Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
Steven Keats, of Bayside, New York, pleaded guilty to a
charge of conspiracy to commit mail fraud.
In his plea allocution, Keats admitted that while working at a
Connecticut-based list brokerage firm, he arranged for lists of consumers’
names and addresses to be provided to a fraudulent mailer. The mailer, a Swiss entity, mailed deceptive
solicitations to vulnerable victims. The
mailing pieces falsely informed recipients that they had won large cash prizes
and could collect the winnings by paying the mailer of a $50 fee. In reality, there was no prize, and the Swiss
mailer simply collected victims’ payments.
Keats admitted knowing that the names and addresses that he supplied to
the Swiss entity would be used to send these deceptive mailing pieces to
victims across the United States.
As a participant in the conspiracy, Keats provided the names
of tens of thousands of U.S. consumers to the Swiss-based fraudulent
mailer. The charge against Keats carries
a statutory maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a statutory maximum fine
of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or gross loss from the offense.
The United States Postal Inspection Service investigated the
case. The case is being prosecuted by
Trial Attorneys Ehren Reynolds and Alistair Reader of the Department of
Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch.
Florida Resident Charged with Conspiracy to Commit Mail
Fraud
Eugene Marotta, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, was charged by
information with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud. The charging document alleges that Marotta
was part of a conspiracy to defraud consumers by sending thousands of
vulnerable victims deceptive mailing pieces that falsely promised prizes. The solicitations were from a shell company
called Palm Beach Liquidation Gallery and were designed to deceive recipients
into believing that they had won hundreds of thousands of dollars as well as an
“exclusive liquidation asset.” To claim
their winnings and the “asset,” recipients were directed to pay a total of
$161.25 as a “liquidation fee.” In fact,
there was no prize, and the “asset” was a cheap poster. Marotta and his co-conspirators pocketed the
money sent by victims.
The scheme allegedly caused more $1 million in losses to at
least 6,000 victims. The charge against
Marotta carries a statutory maximum penalty of up to 5 years in prison and a
statutory maximum fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or gross loss from
the offense.
A criminal information is an accusation and not evidence of
guilt. The defendant should be presumed
innocent unless and until proven guilty.
The United States Postal Inspection Service investigated the
case. The case is being prosecuted by
Trial Attorney Ehren Reynolds of the Department of Justice’s Consumer
Protection Branch.
For more information about the Consumer Protection Branch,
visit its website at www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch. For more information about the U.S.
Attorneys’ Offices for the Eastern District of New York and Southern District
of Florida visit their websites at www.justice.gov/usao-edny and
www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl.
No comments:
Post a Comment