SANTA ANA,
California – A federal jury this morning found seven people guilty of
conspiracy and mail fraud for participating in a decades-long, multi-million
dollar telemarketing scheme that targeted thousands of small businesses and
charities.
During a
seven-week trial in United States District Court, the jury heard evidence that
members of the conspiracy – going as far back as 1988 – bilked more than 50,000
victims by posing as their regular supplier of printer toner and selling them toner
at greatly inflated prices. Over one six-year span, victims were induced to
send more than $126 million to the telemarketing scammers.
The
defendants found guilty today are:
Gilbert N.
Michaels, 77, of West Los Angeles, who orchestrated the scheme, and who owned
and operated IDC SERVCO, a Culver City-based business that sold toner to small
businesses, charities (such as Easter Seals Disability Services and the United
Way), schools, churches, city governments and other entities in the United
States and Canada;
James R.
Milheiser, 53, of Huntington Beach, who owned and/or controlled Material
Distribution Center, PDM Marketing, Bird Coop Industries, Inc., and Copier
Products Center;
Leah D. Johnson,
54, of Ignacio, Colorado, who owned Capital Supply Center and LJT Distribution,
Inc.;
Jonathan M.
Brightman, 52, of Westlake Village, who owned Copy Com Distribution, Inc.;
Independent Cartridge Supplier; and Corporate Products;
Sharon Scandaliato
Virag, 54, of West Hills, who owned XL Supply, Inc.;
Tammi L. Williams,
44, of Chino Hills, who was the office manager at Elite Office Supply, and also
worked at Specialty Business Center, Rancho Office Supply and Select Imaging
Supplies; and
Francis S.
Scimeca, 54, of Woodland Hills, who owned Supply Central Distribution, Inc. and
Priority Office Supply.
Each
defendant was found guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud.
Michaels also was found guilty of 10 counts of mail fraud and five counts of
money laundering. Milheiser, Johnson, Brightman, and Scimeca were also found
guilty of mail fraud.
In
furtherance of the scheme, the telemarketers typically posed as the regular
suppliers of the victim companies and told the companies that the price of toner
had increased, they had not been notified of the increase, and the victims now
had a chance to purchase toner at the previous, lower price. Believing that
they were dealing with their regular supplier of toner, employees at the victim
companies signed order confirmation forms, which prompted defendant Michaels’
company IDC SERVCO to ship toner to victims and send invoices that demanded
payment at inflated prices.
When the
victim companies realized they had been scammed, they called IDC SERVCO to
complain. The victims were typically told that IDC could not cancel the order
or refund money because the victims had signed order confirmation forms. IDC
also failed to disclose its relationships to the telemarketing companies that
had actually brokered the fraudulent deals.
In many
cases, IDC employees threatened victims with collections or legal action if
they did not pay an invoice. In the cases where IDC agreed to take toner back,
victims were forced to pay significant “restocking fees.”
Most victims
received toner at no extra cost as part of their printer or copier service
agreements. The telemarketers knew there had not been a price increase for
toner, and failed to disclose that the prices they were charged were two to ten
times the regular cost of toner.
Another
aspect of the fraud was that the telemarketers failed to disclose that they
were affiliated with IDC. In a series of court orders dating back to November
1988, Michaels and his companies were prohibited from making false statements –
such as that they were a usual supplier of photocopier supplies or that there
had been price change – and they were required to provide oversight to
“independent sales companies.” Michaels violated these court orders by working
with and providing financing to independent sales companies that were engaged
in deceptive and fraudulent practices, despite the fact that IDC received
hundreds of thousands of complaints from victims claiming they had been
defrauded.
Fourteen
other defendants charged in this case previously pleaded guilty to federal
criminal charges.
United
States District Judge James V. Selna has scheduled a May 29, 2020 sentencing
hearing, at which time the seven defendants convicted today will face, at
least, a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.
The
investigation into this toner fraud case was conducted by the Huntington Beach
Police Department, the United States Secret Service, the FBI and the Orange
County District Attorney’s Office.
This case is
being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Gregory W. Staples,
Bradley E. Marrett, and Benjamin D. Lichtman of the Santa Ana Branch Office.
No comments:
Post a Comment