CHICAGO — An employee of a restaurant-reservation company
used fake names and email addresses to create hundreds of fraudulent restaurant
bookings through a competitor’s system, according to a criminal charge filed
today by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago.
STEVEN ADDISON worked as an Enterprise Operations Specialist
in the Chicago office of a San Francisco-based company that provides an online
reservation system for restaurants. From
November 2017 until February 2018, Addison booked more than 300 fraudulent
reservations at Chicago restaurants that use Reserve, a competing reservation
service, according to a criminal information filed in federal court in
Chicago. Many of the bogus reservations
were made on busy days, including New Year’s Eve and Valentine’s Day, when
Addison knew restaurants would suffer financial losses when no diners showed up
to claim the reservation, the information states. Addison’s scheme intended to demonstrate to
Chicago restaurants that Reserve had an inferior reservation system, the charge
alleges.
The information charges Addison, 30, of Chicago, with one
count of wire fraud. Arraignment in
federal court in Chicago has not yet been scheduled.
The charge was announced by John R. Lausch, Jr., United
States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; and Jeffrey S. Sallet,
Special Agent-in-Charge of the Chicago office of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney
Sunil R. Harjani represents the government.
According to the information, Addison began his scheme after
discovering that Reserve’s software did not prevent reservations from users who
entered a fake email address or a fake phone number. Addison made reservations using names such as
“Hans Gruber,” “Richard Ashcroft” and “Jimmy Smits,” bogus email addresses such
as “billygala@hotmai.com,” and fake phone numbers such as “199-999-99999,” the
information states.
Addison made the reservations on his own accord and did not
personally profit from the scheme, the information states.
The public is reminded that an information is not evidence
of guilt. The defendant is presumed
innocent and entitled to a fair trial at which the government has the burden of
proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
If convicted, the Court must impose a reasonable sentence under federal
statutes and the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
No comments:
Post a Comment